Absolute power
[ssba]

by Apostolos Kotsabasis

Frank and Claire Underwood were never merely fictional characters; they were a rehearsal. Ten years ago, the television series House of Cards sketched the blueprint in cold, elegant shots: ruthless ambition wrapped in a Southern drawl and designer clothes, marriages built on power rather than love, manipulation disguised as partnership. They moved through the corridors of Washington like predators in bespoke suits, breaking rules, destroying enemies and allies alike, smiling for the cameras with dead eyes. The series made it seem almost seductive — until it no longer was.

Now, in 2026, the Underwoods have stepped off the screen and into the White House. The parallels are too precise to ignore. A couple that treats the presidency as the ultimate conquest, where policy is secondary to domination, loyalty is transactional, and every public appearance is carefully staged theater. The hair is different, the accent is different, but the mechanisms feel chillingly familiar: the permanent campaign, the cycles of revenge, the way personal grievances harden into national policy.

The difference lies in the tone. The Underwoods were polished, cynical, and almost British in their coldness. The Trumps are louder, more chaotic, more unmistakably American — the raw ego wrapped in gold trim and red ties. Fiction was cooler, more composed; reality is messier, cruder, and in some ways more honest in its brazenness. What House of Cards presented as dark satire has become everyday governance, with fewer cigarettes and more posts on Truth Social.

In the end, the Underwoods did not predict the future. They simply arrived first. The Trumps made it louder, bigger, and impossible to ignore. Fiction did not imitate reality. Reality swallowed fiction whole and kept moving, indifferent to the difference.

[ssba]
Opinions